News

Now that the health care vote has been delayed (for now), it appears that tax reform will move to the top of the agenda.

Just like with health care reform, the details are being kept hidden for now. No matter what plans are put forward, you can be sure that we at Fair Share will:

- Eliminate loopholes that hurt Main Street: armed with legions of tax lawyers and lobbyists, the biggest and most profitable companies carve out loopholes that allow them to dodge taxes, and leave smaller, local businesses to pick up the tab. We're working to make everyone play by the same rules.

- Bring the facts to people on the ground: Both sides of the debate will have their talking points about how great their plans are, and how bad the others are. We can cut through the spin and get facts to people by doing local work about the real impacts.

- Do what we've done before: In 2012, Fair Share sent organizers to the districts of 21 swing Republicans to push them to back protecting middle class tax rates, but rolling back tax cuts for the highest earners. We were able to flip 5 of our targets.

Fair Share responded to President Donald Trump's joint address to Congress by highlighting the danger to misrepresenting the challenges facing the U.S. tax code.

If we want to base our debate on tax reform on reality and fairness, we need to correct the record. Last night, we heard the president repeat a common myth about our corporate tax code -- that American companies pay the highest corporate taxes in the world. In fact, the average effective tax rate for U.S. companies is 27.1%, which is below average for other major economies, which average 27.8%.

Our loophole-ridden corporate tax code is rigged for a select set of big companies and their armies of tax lawyers. That's where the American corporate tax system really leads the way. Loopholes allow a few companies to pay almost nothing while others pay 35% or more. We are deeply concerned with any tax reform that instead of evening the playing field simply increases the rewards for companies who use accounting tricks to avoid taxes by stashing profits overseas.

There is an estimated $2.5 trillion in profits from U.S. companies stashed offshore, which, thanks to loopholes in the law, allows companies to indefinitely defer the taxes they own on that profit. Most of that money, 66 percent, is held by just 30 companies.

Any tax reform that doesn’t address the loopholes is a sham. Let’s start with the premise that everyone should pay a fair share, and everyone should play by the same rules.

Rep. John Delaney (D-MD) is putting forward two bills, “Partnership to Build America Act” and the “Infrastructure 2.0 Act,” which are tax giveaways posing as infrastructure spending.

Fair Share is joining with our allies at FACT to oppose these bills, and call for real reform that evens out the tilted playing field of corporate taxes, not makes it worse.

Already, our loophole-ridden corporate tax code is rigged for big companies and their armies of tax lawyers. By stashing profits in offshore tax havens through complex accounting schemes, big multinational companies avoid paying hundreds of billions in taxes, leaving the rest of -- taxpayers and smaller businesses -- to pick up the tab.

There is an estimated $2.5 trillion in profits from U.S. companies stashed offshore, which costs taxpayers nearly $718 billion in lost revenue, most of it held by just a few dozen companies. Meanwhile, our local businesses are paying full freight. They don't set up shell companies in the Cayman Islands to stash their money. Why shouldn't everyone play by the same rules?

Both of Rep. Delaney's bill would reward companies who do the most offshoring by offering steep discounts on the money held offshore. They take an already rigged system and rig it further.

The Trump White House previewed part of their infrastructure, and Senate Democrats have countered with a plan on its own.

While we don't know exactly what the administration is planning, during the campaign they offered an overview of a plan that focused on tax breaks for private developers. Over the last few days, a list of possible projects was leaked which appear to be at odds with that earlier overview.

Fair Share supports investing in infrastructure, prioritizing repair, maintenance, long-term sustainability and expanding access to economic opportunities. Here are six reasons why we think the Senate plan will deliver better results for people:

1. It includes investments targeted at expanding access to opportunity. We believe that our infrastructure invests should be done in a such a way that more people can connect to the opportunities in our economy. The Senate Democrats plan would devote $20 billion to making sure that everyone can access high-speed internet, which can help provide new opportunities in tech fields, especially in rural areas. They also invest in modernizing schools, and connecting struggling areas to job opportunities. The Trump plan does not make similar investments, in part because it relies on public private partnerships which are very unlikely to be set up in places of greatest need.

2. It paves the way for more clean energy. Solar and wind power, and energy efficiency are creating new jobs while cutting back on pollution and helping transition from the decline of coal. The Senate Democrats plan allocates $100 billion to improve transmission, storage and improve incentives. The original Trump policy doesn't mention clean energy, while the leaked possible project list includes 3 projects for a total of $10.5 billion.

3. It pays for itself by making the corporate tax code more fair. Currently, our tax laws allow multinational companies to hide their profits offshore and "defer" U.S. taxes indefinitely. It's estimated closing this loophole and making those companies pay what they owe would raise $718 billion immediately, and $100 billion each year moving forward. Not only would closing loopholes fund all these critical investments in infrastructure, it evens the playing field for smaller local businesses, which don't set up tax shelters in the Cayman Islands but have to compete against other businesses playing by different rules. The Trump plan does not provide a way to pay for itself and therefore would add to the deficit.

4. It avoids privatization boondoggles. The most troubling part of the Trump plan is the reliance on privatization to create infrastructure improvements. These privatization deals tend to be great for the private company and bad for the taxpayer. These deals have historically guaranteed profits to a private company, while losses get put on the backs of taxpayers. This isn't how you drain the swamp. The other problem with tax incentives as the main mechanism is that it would only work for new projects. We think the priority must be on fixing broken roads, bridges, public transit systems and water infrastructure. Also, private partnerships will focus on places with an already strong economy, leaving struggling areas further behind.

5. It invests in greener, more accessible forms of transportation. People, particularly millennials and seniors, want to see more alternative transportation -- from train and bus service to walkable towns and bike lanes. Public transit ridership has grown 37% over the last 20 years, but repairs have not kept up. The Senate democrats help fix and expand clean, efficient public transportation. There are several projects on the leaked administration project list that would also meet this goal, though, again, we are unsure how committed to that list of projects the administration is.

6. It's focused on repair and maintenance. It is unclear how much the final Trump plan will focus on repair and maintenance, as this is one of the main conflicts in the released plan, and the leaked project list. This is important, as far too much of our federal transportation and infrastructure funding has gone toward new projects, many of which were unnecessary -- including the famous bridge to nowhere. While it's possible that the final Trump plan will take that into account, the Senate democrats plan clearly has it as a focus. It's time we fix problems like lead in drinking water and dangerous bridges, and not invest in more sprawl.